Thursday, August 27, 2009

Unification of Italy in 1870 More Conquest than Liberation

The 150th Anniversary of the Unification of Italy appears that it will be met with a yawn, or recriminations. In fact it reminds me a lot of the Yankees and Confederates in the US and the Civil War.
Unification had been an act of conquest rather than liberation, had been followed by fascism and then post-war cronyism and corruption,

The South laments the demise of the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies, sacrificed to the interests of northern industrialists under "a form of colonialism known as the unity of Italy".

Unbelievably The Northern League after stripping the South of it's Industry, and Treasury in Naples, The North now complains they are "saddled" with an impoverished region.


Italians still at odds over unification of country 150 years on
ITALY: Plans for official anniversary of union see old wounds reopened
Scotland Sunday Herald; From Philip Willan in Rome; August 27, 2009

IT WAS

the Austrian statesman Prince Klemens von Metternich who famously observed: "Italy is a geographical expression". That was in a letter written in 1849, 12 years before Italy emerged as a unified state.

That dismissive view of the country of has been echoed a century and a half later by Umberto Bossi, the founder of the federalist and xenophobic Northern League, who is today one of the most influential ministers in the government of media magnate Silvio Berlusconi.

Bossi's lack of enthusiasm for a united Italy is proving an embarrassment as the government prepares to celebrate the 150th anniversary of the unification of the country, to be officially marked on March 17, 2011.

The government's lackadaisical approach to the occasion has sparked a tussle over the tortured cultural soul of a people accustomed to division by a history of feuding city states and warring political factions that continues from the Guelfs and the Ghibelines to the Bossis and Berlusconis of today.

President Giorgio Napolitano has written to the government to inquire politely what its plans are for the anniversary and former President Carlo Azeglio Ciampi has threatened to resign as chairman of the anni-versary oversight committee if the government shows no sign of believing in the event.

"Certain members of the present government are imposing a tendency not to decide anything," Ciampi complained in an interview published by the Turin daily La Stampa on Friday.

The government has identified some 11 construction projects, ranging from a new cinema complex in Venice to the refurbishment of theatres and museums in Naples and Reggio Calabria, and to the enlargement of Perugia's international airport, as part of an anniversary facelift for the nation.

But money is tight and the Northern League distinctly unkeen.

Bossi declared recently that the appropriate expenditure for the celebrations was "zero".

The League's newspaper, La Padania, explained why in an article titled: "Unity of Italy, what is there to celebrate?"

The birth of the Italian state was "an act against nature and against history", the paper said, and the only solution was federalism, a political order corresponding to "the true, deep soul of the country".

The unification of the country, achieved by national heroes such as Giuseppe Garibaldi and Giuseppe Mazzini, was actually the fruit of "violence, abuse of power and theft", according to Northern League MP Marco Rondini.

Italians felt greater identification with their city council than with the nation, so it was no surprise they wouldn't be waving the tricolour flag for the anniversary, Rondini said. With other politicians off on their summer holidays, League representatives have kept up a barrage of provocative proposals, from changing the national anthem to promoting regional dialects and traditions in schools.

One League MP has proposed a law allowing the celebration of marriages in local dialect, while the mayor of Capriate, in the northern state of Lombardy, has issued a ban on "alien" kebab stalls in his town centre.

From the pages of the Corriere della Sera newspaper political commentator Ernesto Galli della Loggia warned that the construction projects marking the anniversary were an illustration of how the country's leaders had lost touch with the real cultural background of the country. "How can someone celebrate the birth of Italy who has no idea at all of what the country really is?" Galli della Loggia asked polemically.

The article elicited a response from a Northern League-supporting student, who explained in a letter to the paper why some young people like him felt so little identification with the history of their own country.

Unification had been an act of conquest rather than liberation, had been followed by fascism and then post-war cronyism and corruption, wrote Matteo Lazzaro in his open letter to the Corriere.

"If I draw up a balance sheet from national unity to today, there seem to be more things to be ashamed of than of which to be proud," he wrote.

And disaffection for the unified state is not confined to the industrial north. A blog by the writer Mimmo Marseglia laments the demise of the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies, sacrificed to the interests of northern industrialists under "a form of colonialism known as the unity of Italy".

As Bossi calls for the replacement of the national anthem with Va Pensiero, a popular aria from Verdi's opera Nabucco, it is not surprising to learn that the tomb of Goffredo Mameli, the composer of the official anthem, lies in a state of unkempt neglect in Rome's Verano cemetery.

No other major European country seems so ill-at-ease and divided over its own recent history. No surprise then that it should be riven over where it wants to go in the future and how to honour its first 150 years of life.

http://www.sundayherald.com/international/shinternational/display.var.2526963.0.0.php

5 comments:

Yuri said...

If Southern/Insular Italians (grossly corresponding to the erstwhile enchanted Kingdom of the Two Sicilies) feel unhappy about still belonging to the Italian state, in this year of grace, 2009, they are given by the law of the Italian Republic a very simple means to split away from it: get together 500,000 signatures and apply for a referendum to that purpose. If the “YES” for the separation outnumber the “NO’s”, they are free to set up their own independent state, or even ask to be annexed to Libya (it’s not that far).
They should be careful, however, about who to admit to the vote. If they include the populations of Northern-Central Italy, there would be – under the “good riddance” principle – a much greater chance for the separation.
"If Southern/Insular Italians (grossly corresponding to the erstwhile enchanted Kingdom of the Two Sicilies) feel unhappy about still belonging to the Italian state, in this year of grace, 2009, they are given by the law of the Italian Republic a very simple means to split away from it: get together 500,000 signatures and apply for a referendum to that purpose. If the “YES” for the separation outnumber the “NO’s”, they are free to set up their own independent state, or even ask to be annexed to Libya (it’s not that far).
They should be careful, however, about who to admit to the vote. If they include the populations of Northern-Central Italy, there would be – under the “good riddance” principle – a much greater chance for the separation.

"Your request could not be processed. Please try again."
WHY?

John said...

Gentlemen,

The unification of any country, whether it be mine (Canada) or yours (USA), is an entirely imperfect process that will alienate some, please others while most will remain indifferent. The Kingdom of Two Sicilies was created by a series of foreign dominated oligarchies after at least 700 years (starting with the Normans) of non-Italian kings.
At the very least, the House of Savoy was Italian (not French) by origin, language, culture and temperament. The reunification of the Italian people was logical on a geographical, cultural, and socio-economic-legal basis.
The notion that the vast majority of Italians are at odds with present-day Italy is absurd and xenophobic foreign pundits contrive articles to this effect.
Bossi is a demagogue and a shameless self-promoter while Metternich was an unabashed Italophobe who once lamented that too many (actually all of them) of Vienna's regal Baroque buildings were built by Italian architects and engineers. He also couldn't stand "all of those Italian composers and conductors in Vienna".
As for Mr. Willan, he really seems to be woefully misinformed. Spain, France and even Great Britain have to deal with important sentiments of disunity that are far more pressing than those facing Italy.

Yuri said...

Addressed to Mr John:
The region "Savoie" IS French (capital: Chambery), and such was the remote origin of the Savoia family and Italian monarchic dinasty. But I, an Italian, don't find that relevant. Reigning families assume the citizenship of the countries they come to reign on, and the ties with the country of origin dilute with time and gradually disappear: they do (as they should) the interests of their new country, The Swedish royal family descends from the very French Jean Baptiste Bernadotte, one of Napoleon's marshals, who eventually was fired and considered a traitor by his former boss, because he refused to drag his army of Swedish men into a disastrous battle (an amusing detail: the left half of the coat of arms of the Swedish Royal family bears something that looks a bit too much like the fascist symbol, the "fascio" - only, the ax is substituted by a pair of very Viking-looking horns). The BRITISH royal family, Windsor, was originally the verr-ee German family Saxe-Coburg-Gotha (name changed in 1917, during WW.1)- and God knows they've been at odds with Germany more than once!
The fact so many mention, disdainfully, that French was the everyday language in the Savoia family, doesn't mean anything. They did it because in those days French was THE elegant language to speak ("BEI TEMPI"!)and they wanted to keep fluent in it. The same used to be done in the Holstein-Gottorp-Romanov family (Czars of Russia, 1613-1917), for the very same reason - and nobody can say they were French (see, e.g., 1812)-
Cordially,

Yuri
" Your request could not be processed. Please try again."
WHY??!!!

John said...

Dear Yuri,

If for no other reason than to set the record straight, I am afraid I must disagree with you and state that never in their history was the House of Savoy French. Umberto I was German speaking and he married into an Italian family; the region was primarily settled by Italic/Latin (Romans) speaking peoples, notwithstanding the migration of Gauls across the borders. Italian became the official language some 450 years ago with Emmanuele Filiberto reign although French was often used in official capacities. Parenthetically, I use French everyday since it is the lingua franca of my city but I'm certainly not French. Charles I (French) had invaded the region during the height of the Renaissance but this was of little consequence. As I mentioned, it was eminently prudent and logical that the House of Savoy should be at the head of united Italy.

Yuri said...

Mr John: thanks for the very useful info about the Savoia dinasty, I will surely keep it in mind. Which "Umberto I" are you talking about? The one commonly known (Torino, 1844-Monza, 1900) married his cousin Margherita). However, this does not eliminate the geographical fact that the REGION "Savoie" is IN FRANCE and its capital is Chambery, Savoie, France, where the castle of the family still stands.
If it was "eminently prudent and logical that the House of Savoy should be at the head of united Italy" I don't know, but it is a fact that the were the ones with enough guts to accomplish it in 13 years time (1848-1861) - while the people of that enchanted heaven, the erstwhile Kingdom of the Two Sicilies of yore, much larger as to extension, found nothing better to do in 800 years than consigning themselves to the domination of foreigners, iun succession.
What the Savoia's did to Italy afterwards is quite another business,

Very truly,
Yuri

" Your request could not be processed. Please try again."
WHY??!!!

Post a Comment